• More Than Just Words

    For evil to triumph, it only needs that the good do nothing.

    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.

    If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.

    The question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. The nation and the world are in dire need of creative extremists.

  • Your input and viewpoints are welcome. To leave comments or network posts, click on the individual post.
  • If you don't have an RSS Feed Reader, enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Dealing With Parking Fines – Practical Lawful Rebellion

Many of you reading will at one time or another have been victim to the parking fine scam. Scam, I hear you ask. But it’s not a scam, it’s our punishment for parking where we’re told not to. Isn’t it?

Reading these articles will give you a very different perception of the issue of parking fines, and will explain the principles of Lawful Rebellion and demonstrate them in action. Three are from the website of The People’s United Community and one is written by Veronica: of the Chapman Family, author of the book Freedom is more than a 7-letter word, which, I’ll say again, is essential reading.

Submitted by John Harris on Wed, 07/10/2009 – 19:13

By John Harris

Nick a very active TPUC researcher up in sunny Scarborough contacted me sometime ago to set up a talk for me in Scarborough which I attended. Nick proceeded in the hours we spent talking after to tell me about his dealings with the company known as Scarborough Council (company number UC2315264 or is it UC4117872 – they seem to have both?) over a few unpaid PCN’s (Penalty Charge Notices) he had accumulated. The total cost of these PCN’s is over £6000.00 and still this day remain unpaid and for good reason as Nick soon realized that they were nothing more than contractual payments and nothing to do with any sort of fine and in doing so point blank refused to depart with any monies at all relating to these.

Nick lives on a street with parking control near the town centre of Scarborough and picked up some of the PCN’s for parking outside his home and the others for parking round the back of his own shop he runs with his partner in the town centre – both are parking control areas via parking permits which have to be purchased. Nicks feels as many do that he should be able to park outside his home and at the back of his shop without having to pay for the privilege to do so. Subsequently the Company (Scarborough Council) have decided that Nick as many others have to pay for this privilege. Nick simply said enough is enough and refused to purchase a permit and in doing so received the PCN’s.

A little history….

Nick has a history with the council and used to have a very active role with a view to standing as a councilor for Scarborough Council in his local area, not knowing it was a company. Nick started to ask some very interesting questions regarding the councils POLICY (contracts) and subsequently was ousted from the local (con)servative party. Nick took it upon himself to endeavor to find out more and get his questions answered as he started to see strange things start to occur in and around the Scarborough area and surrounding areas. In doing this Nick was led to TPUC and started to talk to me regarding some of the interesting facts he had discovered and highlighted the fact that it was quite obvious that Scarborough Council was conducting business as a company. In doing so Nick started to produce evidence to the fact and is following a course of action to find out even more which will be published by TPUC soon.

The PCN issue escalated to the point that Ian Anderson head of LEGAL services invited Nick to an impromptu meeting in a café in Scarborough town centre. This was to discuss the issue regarding the PCN’s and to offer Nick a deal. The deal was quite simple; pay for a parking permit and all PCN’s acquired would be forgot about and swept under the table so to speak. Nick being Nick (as many of TPUC researchers are) decided in hindsight to take a recording device along to the meeting with him to capture the conversation. The recording that is published along with this article is an excerpt from that conversation where a number of things are revealed.

I have been openly telling people for quite a few months that all PCN’s are nothing more than self perpetuating contracts (contractual payments) in the recording you will hear Ian Anderson head of LEGAL services for Scarborough Council admit they are contractual payments and not fines. Also you will hear about a tribunal you can appeal to over any PCN’s you have received that is based in Manchester that is funded by PCN payments. Nick expresses to Ian that it is in the interest of the tribunal and the people who work there not to repeal any PCN’s in the interest of safe guarding their jobs as the PCN’s fund both.

Nick was using as his defense section 2; clause 12 of the Bill of Rights 1689 saying he had never been convicted in any court, so none of the fines were valid. Understanding now as we do exactly what the wording of this clause means we now know this cannot be used in any sort of defense and would never be needed to be, as we KNOW that these are not FINES they are just simply Contractual Payments and you do NOT have to pay them. They use fear, ignorance and deception to make you believe you do have to pay them – this is racketeering, gaining money by menaces and fraud – YOU cannot be forced into any contractual Payment, which is why they have to deceive you.

As I said before Nick has never paid one of these PCN’s and still receives them daily. They have tried all sorts of enforcement on Nick to try and get Nick to pay, but all attempts have failed and continue to fail. Nick has said “NO” and will never submit to the deceptive fraudulent practices to gain money used by the company known as Scarborough Council.

If you have never read the Bill of Rights 1689 section 2; clause 12 I would advise you to do so and look for the added words missed by most “particular persons” – who are the particular persons – are you? Read it here. The Bill of Rights 1689 is a very good example of the LEGAL industries deceptive documents and highlights the deceptive use of language used by those in the LEGAL industry.

All in all this is a fascinating conversation and we apologise in advance if the quality seems poor but we have tried to make it as clear as possible. I have now added this conversation into my talks and use it within the slide show, conformation of what we have been saying by one of their own heads of LEGAL services.

__________

Submitted by richardlandry on Thu, 25/09/2008 – 22:12

Fixed Penalty Notices: Fraudulent coercion of voluntary payments.

You may have read a previous article called “Your children – the horrifying truth”, and may come to the realisation that you quite literally do not own your own body – or so the system would have you believe. Not only that, but in truth your person is in fact a corporation. Created by the state, upon the filing of your birth certificate registration application, your person is the capitalisation of your name, e.g. ‘MR T ANDERSON’ or variant thereof. It is essential to realise this as fact and whenever a government entity wants to interact with you they will address you by the exact spelling of your PERSON and not you – this is the crucial difference.

Part 1. Fixed penalty notices – the battle ground of the public.

ESSENTIAL VIEWING

Bursting bubbles of government deception (Google Video)

The Magnificent deception (Google Video)

Winston Shrout – Solutions in commerce

DISCLAIMER NOTICE: This article is intended for educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice in any way. If you want legal advice, and a wordy, rambling rebuttal of this article, and a dent in your wallet, go see a lawyer.

I am skimming the surface of the largest subject you could possibly imagine. The founder of this website so asserts “The truth is simple, mankind makes it complicated”. This could never be more true than when applied to the machination of law and legality. The truth here is that you are a flesh and blood man, not a fictional corporation, and so no-one has authority over you except that which you consent to. Please take these words as a guide, and not the divine answer, and commit to learn more about the world they try to put you into.

You’re reading this article because you are aware that something isn’t right with the world. You may not know how, but if you’ve fought against paying council tax / speeding fines / parking tickets for whatever reason, then most likely you have lost. I’m here to tell you that you don’t have to lose, and you have all the information you need at your fingertips.

Speeding fines, Parking Tickets, Littering fines, Bin fines, Council Tax & Environmental taxes are all part of the scam, and many many more superfluous fines are on the way, thanks to the EU – and all of them are unLAWful.

This is very important to remember: unLAWful – not Illegal – as it is common law which is the law of this land, and the law which we all have the right and duty to excersise our use of.

This article will help you understand what the court system really is, and how you can shove a metaphorical spanner in their works. I’ve decided that the best way to focus the subject is upon the daily penalties which we, try as we might, all fall foul of.

Fixed Penalty Notices: The clue is in the name

Fixed penalty notice is a deceptive instrument, because it looks like a serious document which has been dutifully attached to your car. It carries precisely zero authority. You park on a double yellow line, you get one.

A notice is not a bill. A notice is not a demand. A notice is nothing more than… an OFFER. It is an offer to discuss the notice with which you have been served.

You can discharge a notice with a notice of your own sent by recorded delivery. So if you receive a fixed penalty notice then don’t ignore it! To do so is accepting the views the notice expresses, whatever they are!

Action you can take:

These fixed penalty notices are not helping anyone but the state, so why not write your own notice and see how they respond? Your intentions are honest – you simply want to understand what it is they are saying in their notice, and it is precisely how I became involved in this in the first place.

The first thing to remember is be civilised. Write your own notice straight back. Don’t protest unless you are certain of mistaken identity; simply accept what they have said to you, but with your conditions attached. This notice is known as a ‘Notice of conditional acceptance’, and effectively pops the ball back into their court.

Your notice can say whatever you like. I would suggest you keep it on topic, and try to question the facts as laid out in their notice. Your notice could be as simple as ‘I have read and conditionally accepted your notice, providing you answer the following questions 1) 2) 3)’. Think up some questions. Is there anything about the Traffic Management Act 2004 you don’t understand? If you can’t think of any questions to ask, why not take a look at our model answer?

To get you started, how about this for a 1st reply:

==============================================

[ADDRESS]

[DATE]

Re: FIXED PENALTY NOTICE AB12345678 – Issued [date]

Notice of Discharge of Outstanding Penalty Notice and Request for Clarification.

To [address]

You have apparently made allegations of criminal conduct against me.

You have apparently made demands upon me.

I do not understand those apparent demands and therefore cannot lawfully fulfil them.

I seek clarification of your document so that I may act according to the law and maintain my entire body of God given Natural Rights.

Failure to accept this offer to clarify and to do so completely and in good faith within 7 days will be deemed by all parties to mean you and your principal or other parties abandon all demands upon me.

I conditionally accept your offer to agree that I am NAME and that I owe £??.??, upon proof of claim of all of the following:

1. Upon proof of claim that I am a person and not a human being.

2. Upon proof of claim that you know what a ‘person’ actually is, legally speaking.

3. Upon proof of claim that you know what the difference between a ‘human being’ and a ‘person’ actually is, legally speaking.

4. Upon proof of claim that I am NAME and not Name

5. Upon proof of claim that the charge was the result of a lawful investigation unmarred by prejudice.

6. Upon proof of claim that I am a member of the society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are enforcing.

7. Upon proof of claim that I showed you some sort of identification.

8 Upon proof of claim that there is a nameable society that I belong to and that the laws covered within this alleged transgression state that they apply to me within that named society

Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity

[Signature]

================================================

Do not take this action lightly and if you are unprepared for the consequences; we applaud your interests but if you wish to fully understand the rules of the game, rest assured time and concentration are required. The responsibilities lie on your shoulders. Use the resources listed and we wish you success in your studies.

___________

Submitted by richardlandry on Wed, 29/10/2008 – 19:45

Some breaking news of a positive nature for TPUC-goers

Recently a reader emailed in with their story after reading about the action you can take in serving a notice in response to a PCN (See more on that here).

You can read the notice and response in full below. The fraudulent nature of extracting your money is exposed when Islington Parking Services were on the receiving end from a TPUC reader, and promptly withdrew the charge after 2 weeks by letter.

So; excuses given by them aside, what have YOU got to lose in writing a single letter to challenge your latest PCN?

See how powerful we can all truly be?!

THE PENALTY CHARGE NOTICE

The notice sent out:

The tactical withdrawal…

Job done!

__________

(The following article can no longer be found on Freeman-on-the-Land)

Fixed Penalty Charge Notice (UK only)

Disclaimer: Nothing herein constitutes professional legal advice. I am not a Lawyer. Before embarking on anything you should seek professional legal advice. The hope is simply that, when seeking that advice, you know which questions to ask. Please note: This only applies to the United Kingdom, and specifically to England. Other nations/countries may have variances. This information is provided for educational purposes only.

Here is a template that could be used to ‘stalemate’ a Penalty Charge Notice such as could result from a Parking Ticket or Congestion Charge.

It is well worth trying because it has been discovered to work. Ensure that you read the notes on the second page, and follow them very carefully.

What is happening it this. You are agreeing to pay the amount demanded, subject to 8 conditions that you set.

Because you have agreed to pay, there is no longer any ‘controversy’ over the amount demanded. Consequently it is impossible for you to be taken to court over this matter. Why? Because there is nothing for the court to decide. There is no controversy for them to adjudicate upon. If you subsequently receive a Summons about it, you can write back to the court with a copy of your letter. The court would then go back and ask the creators of the PCN what the hell they thought they were playing at! 

However, although you have agreed to pay, as a human being, you have stipulated certain conditions. It is your right to do that, and that right cannot be taken away from you, particularly as the stipulations are in the form of questions to be answered.

Yes, you have agreed to pay, but only on condition to all those questions receive suitable answers. If one of those conditions cannot be met, then the claim against you fails, and there is nothing for you to pay.

The questions are in the form of ‘proofs of claim’. ‘They’ have to prove ‘their’ claims … claims being an integrated part of ‘their’ overall demand.

All you will have done is to take their overall demand, and chopped it up into small pieces, and ask them to justify each small piece.

‘They’ will not even be able to prove one of these pieces, let alone all eight.

 

‘They’ only win because people do not look underneath the facade, underneath the wallpaper. When you look under the wallpaper you can see all the cracks in the wall.

Here is the response someone received (Full story here)

“Thank you for you letter regarding the above Penalty Charge Notice which was recently received at this office.

Having assessed the case, I am not satisfied with the evidence collected by the Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO) when the PCN was issued. Accordingly I am not able to properly investigate your challenge to the PCN. As I cannot satisfy myself the PCN was issued correctly, I shall be cancelling this charge.

As this ticket has now been cancelled, there is no need for you to take any further action.

Yours … etc.”

Veronica: of the Chapman family

January, 2009

____________

Knowledge is Power, and as one of the bits of graffiti on the cover of Psyclone says, your ignorance is their bliss.

Advertisements

3 Responses

  1. Hi there, first of all thank you for all your efforts in bringing about all this info and guidance! I recently received a parking Notice for parking in a privately owned area. I sent the e.g you have above with an additional proof of claim as I have my own legal notice stating a removal fee for anything put onto my vehicle without pre written consent. After 7 days passed I received a letter stating my appeal is not relevant as it is for a council issue not a private. Could you please help if there is anything further I should/shouldnt do or should I just leave it as it has passed the 7 days I gave them before all allegations are dropped or is that then accepting there new proposal if i ignore it? Appreciate any help or advice. Love and light

    • Hi Skott,

      Glad to hear that that information is still proving useful to people. Also glad to hear that there are still folk out there resisting officially sanctioned theft. Unfortunately we’re not in a position to give up to date advice on the issue. That article was written five years ago, and it’s possible that things have changed. The links included in that and all the other posts that cover the issue no longer lead to the data, which suggests something like that too. My personal belief, based on my dated knowledge is that your legal notice, if clearly visible, is enforceable, as are any time limitations in it. The best advice I can give is to continue with your online search. Those groups and individuals who are up to date with things aren’t shy about it and won’t be hard to find.

      Good on you and good luck.

      TV @ The Psyclone Project

      PS. Thanks also for following us. Please note that this blog is no longer updated and exists now for archival access to the five years of data on it. The current incarnation can be found in The Centre of the Psyclone (www.centreofthepsyclone.com)

      • Thankyou very much for your quick response! I didn’t realise it was 5 years ago 🙂 yes things have definitely changed and will continue to but as long as we are human and one with the earth we shouldn’t be denied our free will! I feel it in my gut to see it through and worst thing I will have to give them money which when you get down to it has no value and is just an I owe you so I’m not going to be feared by the outcome and I mean no harm to any one. All the best and thank you again 🙂 I will let you no how I get on.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: